Is VAR Hurting Football More Than It Helps?

A recent article from "The Guardian" explores growing frustrations with VAR (Video Assistant Referee) technology in football, as fans and players question its impact on the game’s flow and emotional momentum. For those unfamiliar, VAR is a system introduced to review key decisions such as goals, penalties, red cards, and cases of mistaken identity by allowing referees to rewatch footage during or after play. While designed to increase fairness and reduce clear errors, many argue that VAR is instead slowing matches down, causing long pauses after pivotal moments, and even undermining players’ mental focus by revisiting incidents well after they’ve occurred. Critics also note that referees, armed with the ability to rewatch challenges in slow motion, are now issuing harsher punishments, leading to questions about whether this retrospective scrutiny aligns with the spirit of the game.

In my opinion, the deeper issue isn’t just that VAR exists, it’s that referees have come to rely too heavily on it as a safety net. Rather than trusting their instincts and making confident on-field calls, referees increasingly use VAR, afraid to make the “wrong” decision that could lead to viral outrage or media criticism. This over-reliance creates an environment where the game halts unnecessarily, decisions lose immediacy, and the authority of the referee on the pitch feels diminished. Instead of being a supportive tool for rare, clear-cut errors, VAR has become a crutch, reflecting a broader crisis of confidence in officiating.

This isn’t solely the referees’ fault, however. We as fans bear some responsibility. In today’s hypercritical sports culture, referees face intense scrutiny, not just for their professional decisions, but sometimes on a deeply personal level via social media and online forums. Public backlash over controversial calls is often swift and harsh, creating a climate where officials fear mistakes more than they embrace their judgment. It’s no wonder they turn to technology for validation. Yet, football has always included human error; it’s part of the unpredictability that makes the sport thrilling. If we demand perfection from referees while vilifying them for natural mistakes, we risk influencing the very drama that keeps us hooked to this sport.

The solution, I believe, lies in better referee training paired with cultural change among fans and pundits. Officials need more support to develop confidence in their real-time decision-making, using VAR sparingly rather than reflexively. At the same time, fans must learn to accept that human error is intrinsic to the game’s fabric. Until we strike this balance, VAR will continue to overshadow football’s spontaneity, replacing passion and flow with paralysis and second-guessing.

---